Why cyber-attacks on state critical infrastructure should be banned

Cyber-warfare is on the table of many contemporary military planners. Today they are trying to identify the role which cyber-weapons will have in wars of tomorrow. As cyber-weapons have proved to have corporeal physical effects that can be used as a means of war, it is clear that states are getting progressively concerned with their critical infrastructures (CI). For example, just recently Federal Bureau of Investigations and Department of Homeland Security in U.S. have issued warnings of possible cyber-attacks that can come from so-called “Syrian Electronic Army”, whose hackers have been targeting U.S. for sometime already. Security institutions in U.S. are thus especially concerned with situation ahead of possibility of military attack on Syria.

As states progressively depend on the intricate networks of infrastructures that provide functionality for the living frameworks such as housing, food, trade, communications, etc. the threats of the collapse of such infrastructures present challenges to national security. It has to be taken into account, that before weapons that could have damaged such infrastructures to catastrophic results required a lot of resources for their development and certain conditions for their deployment, such as for example the situation of an armed conflict. Today, the cyber-weapons are very easily procured with very limited resources and can be easily deployed without barrier of certain conditions.

What is most worrisome is the possibility of cyber-attacks on industrial control systems (ICS, or also known as SCADA systems) that can bring malfunctions in such systems as energy grids, oil and gas pipelines, critical communications of transportation, water-dams and cause their destruction with effect immediately targeting large group of civilian populations. Taking down train-control systems that will result in derailing of the locomotives are unlikely to directly target military objectives, the same can go to water-dams sabotage and the resulting flood.

As studies show SCADA systems can be very vulnerable to cyber-attacks and can be exploited to the point where the false information is inserted into the system (through so-called “worms” or other malicious software) and can have kinetic effect of collapse of the physical system within a matter of minutes if not seconds. At the same time isolation of the systems and going back approximately 30 years (when computer network systems didn’t exist) is not feasible anymore.

Described threats may be felt first of all by the oil and gas SCADA as they can be tempting targets for many politically motivated cyber-attackers. For certain states, for example, such as Turkey, Azerbaijan and Georgia (TAG) such situation should not be overlooked. Linked by the network of oil and gas pipelines of last generations these countries undoubtedly use the latest models of SCADAs. It has to be pointed out that such networks of pipelines will only grow in size and numbers according to the development plans of these states. Moreover, these countries are also linked by the Trans-Eurasian Information Super Highway (TASIM) project. TASIM is going to connect through fiber-optic line countries of Western Europe with Eastern Asia passing through TAG countries in the process making their respective cyberspaces even closer and comparable with their pipeline cooperation. The importance of the project is highlighted by the recent discussion in the UN General Assembly on September 4, 2013. With that in mind it has to be taken into account that though technological progress and integration can facilitate economic and social growth it also presents the stakeholders with certain security vulnerabilities.

It is logical then that SCADA systems should be protected. However, as undoubtedly a large number of technicians are working around the globe to boost cyber-security for industrial control systems, there always going to be a race between them and cyber-attackers. Another way of protecting SCADA systems is outlawing the attacks on such systems internationally. It is clear that such attacks will bring more damage to civilians rather that military objects and can be used more like the means of terror rather that means of war to achieve legitimate military objectives. With that in mind it is clear that such cyber-attacks should be banned as use of chemical and biological weapons, as terrorism, as illegitimate use of force. It should be done now to prevent the states from being tempted to use such cyber-attacks as covert options of “untraceable” use of force, due to the difficulties of attributing of a cyber-attack to the particular state.

Hence, there is a possibility for the group of countries like TAG to raise awareness and influence international community to the problems on cyber-attacks on CI. Through projects such as TASIM they can address the states bringing their attention to both great opportunities of integrated cyberspace as well as the need of joint action in international cyber-security.

Kamal Makili-Aliyev

Doctor of Laws (LL.D)

21.11.2013

Turkish Weekly

Continue reading →

New Policy Paper on Caspian Security

Please read my new policy paper: "Impact of the U.S. Withdrawal from the South Caucasus on the Regional Security of the Caspian Basin" published in the course of research in Institute for Training and Development's National Security Institute - in common publication "Post-Hegemonic Global Governance". The excerpt with my policy paper can be found here.

Continue reading →

New article on Security Sector Reform in Azerbaijan in newest publication of CENAA

Please read my new article on Security Sector Reform in Azerbaijan in new book by Centre for European and North Atlantic Affairs - "Security Sector Reform in Countries of Visegrad and Southern Caucasus: Challenges and Opportunities" M.Majer ed. that can be found here.

Continue reading →

“Cyber-arming”: States prepare against external and internal cyber-threats

The digital age is already here.Information technology is one of the main reasons for the gargantuan increases in productivity and the improvement in human happiness and wellbeing. The physical world is now in the process of fusion with the virtual world of cyberspace, which has infiltrated almost every aspect of the global economy. The same goes for transportation systems, power and energy grids, military programs, banking and financial systems, communication networks, emergency systems, etc.

While these systems can be linked in cyberspace to create so many beneficial opportunities, it is worth mentioning that such a situation has also paved the way to a large number of emerging security threats -- cyber-threats. Only a decade ago concern about cyber-attacks was limited to the possible inconvenience it might create in cyberspace. However, once it was proven by “Stuxnet” that a cyber-attack can have a very real impact in the physical world, the situation started changing. Suddenly cyber-warfare has stopped being a theme of science fiction and of certain vanguard analysts who are mocked as doomsayers. It is only logical that, in anticipation of possible cyber-conflict, states have started the process of “cyber-arming.”

Given the recent developments in the situation, as the power of the Internet is conquering the world today, such a process seems only logical. The National Security Agency leaks situation created a lot of headaches related to digital privacy across the globe. The fact that the monitoring of both private and official electronic communications has been laid out on the table undoubtedly made a lot of governments across the globe concerned. Revision of the domestic systems of electronic communications, including the responsible use of commercial email accounts, is long overdue in many countries. Moreover, the recent situation with retired Gen. James Cartwright and the cyber operation known as “Olympic Games” that included the cyber-attack on Iran's nuclear program is only making the urge to cyber-arm more justified. Nonetheless, in such a tense cyber-environment, there is a need to distinguish between the countries concerned with internal and external threats to their cyber-infrastructure. Such a difference is quite evident in the comparison of the US and Brazil.

The US has suffered from large-scale cyber-attacks over the last five to seven years. At the same time it has been able to adapt to the changing circumstances and come up with both cyber-strategy and the US Cyber Command (CYBERCOM) to have an adequate response to threats in cyberspace. Most of the recent estimations by the experts and organizations that analyze threats prove that at the top of the list for the US is cyber-threats. Moreover, these threats are likely to originate outside the US from non-state actors, which are gaining a lot of expertise in using cyberspace offensively. As the nature of threats is shifting, so is the need to have a comprehensive defense system that would also be able to implement proactive measures. Such reasoning is behind the process recently started by CYBERCOM to establish a set of teams over the next several years to maintain an adequate response to the external cyber-threats. The increasing offensive cyber-capabilities prove there is a need for the militarization of cyberspace and that the notion of cyber-defense is almost equal to its traditional counterpart. It is thus possible that CYBERCOM will only be expanding in the near future.

On the other hand, for such a prominent regional power as Brazil, the nature of cyber-threats lies in the heart of the country itself. Brazil is riding the recent wave of rapid development and growth, and it is in its interests to ensure that its critical infrastructure, financial and banking systems and communications are stable and safe. The digitalization of the country as a natural outcome of growth is creating additional security challenges in these areas. The cyber-threats originating from individuals and groups targeting banking systems and websites inside the country for both criminal and political reasons have been transformed into the next level of policy headache for the Brazilian government to deal with. While “hacktivists” and cyber-criminals are part of the internal framework of cyber-threats, Brazil realized that boosting its cyber-defenses to maintain domestic infrastructure should be done in concert with the creation of a comprehensive cyber-defense system that would respond to new threats that may arise in the future as well. With that in mind, the cyber-defense center CDCiber was created under the Brazilian Ministry of Defense. The center has large defensive capabilities to protect the national networks as well as providing coordination for its partners and serves as a unified body for cyber-security in the country. CDCiber has already proven itself capable of protecting the networks of the UN Rio+20 sustainable development conference and recent Confederation Cup football.

These examples of cyber-arming are only a small part of the general trend that is seen in the dynamics of the development of many other states both large and small. In this contemporary environment of “cyber arms race,” the lack of international regulations on cyberspace is making the future even more uncertain. With states so concerned by both internal and external cyber-threats, and international legislation already overdue, it is about time to acknowledge that soon we may experience the first real cyber-war.

Kamal Makili-Aliyev

Doctor of Laws (LL.D)

29.06.2013

               Today's Zaman

Continue reading →

Eastern Partnership and Border Security: Perspective of Azerbaijan

Please find my new paper discussing perspective of Azerbaijan on border security issues in EU Eastern Partnership here. Paper analyzes the path of Azerbaijan in developing its border security in accordance with EU standards and norms and provides recommendations to both EU and Azerbaijan on further such development.

Kamal Makili-Aliyev

Doctor of Laws (LL.D)

01.04.2013

Continue reading →

New Paper: Azerbaijan's Foreign Policy: Between East and West...

Please find my new paper on Azerbaijan's Foreign Policy here. In paper I discuss current state of Azerbaijan's regional and international frameworks of foreign policy and how it was able to arrive where it stands now.

 Kamal Makili-Aliyev

Doctor of Laws (LL.D)

28.01.2013

Continue reading →

Foreign Policy Blueprint: Azerbaijan 2012

2012 is over and out, however events of the year are still here with us, defining the future of Azerbaijan. For Azerbaijan past year was successful both in areas of international cultural and sport events as well as in matters of foreign policy and economy. It can be well said that the interaction of the country with international community have increased as well as the positive feedback on the state’s profile. Moreover, economic growth is also stable and running skywards. In 2012 Azerbaijan continued developing on its bilateral relation with its neighbors in terms of cooperation and trade as well as in solving common problems and negating threats.

Looking back at the past year with scores of different events and stories it seems relevant to chose top five events that have made the most impact on the international relations of Azerbaijan:

       Non-permanent membership in the UN Security Council. Elected by the support of 155 member-states of the UN in 2011 as a non-permanent member of the UN Security Council for 2012-13, Azerbaijan marked its first year with active and enthusiastic approach. Starting its membership in January 2012, Azerbaijan due to the rotation was chairing in UN Security Council in May 2012. During the chairmanship of Azerbaijan UN Security Council discussed many issues including non-proliferation of the nuclear weapons, the situation in Middle East, dealing with crisis in Syria as well as with the situation in Balkans and open high level discussion chaired by the President of Azerbaijan on the matters of combating terrorism. Voting and active participation of Azerbaijan in UN Security Council showed the attention and concern of the country towards different situations that international community is faced with.

        First recognitions of the Khojaly genocide. For Azerbaijan 2012 was also successful in terms of recognition of Khojaly genocide. Genocidal acts committed by Armenian armed forces in February 25-26, 1992 in Khojaly village of Azerbaijan that caused 613 civilian deaths, were officially recognized by the Senate of Mexico on January 31, 2012. That was the first official recognition of the genocide on the legislative level. Following that another legislative body – Senate of Pakistan have adopted the resolution condemning the occupation of the 20 percent of territories of Azerbaijan and the genocide against Azerbaijani civilians committed by Armenian armed forces in the Azerbaijani town of Khojaly on 26 February 1992. With that act Pakistan recognized the Khojaly genocide and demanded implementation and enforcement of the UN Security Council resolutions that demand the withdrawal of Armenian armed forces from the occupied territories of Azerbaijan.

      TANAP. Azerbaijan and Turkey have signed international agreement on trans-Anatolian natural gas pipeline project (TANAP) on June 26, 2012. This project can be considered one of the largest events in energy diversification policies of Azerbaijan. The pipeline’s estimated cost is 7 billion USD. The start of construction works is planned for 2014, while the completion of pipeline is scheduled to 2018. Gas from Azerbaijan will be delivered through Turkey to Europe with the planned capacity of TANAP of 16 billion cubic meters of natural gas per year at initial stage. On later stages the planned increase is up to 23 billion cubic meters by 2023, 31 billion cubic meters by 2026, and at the last stage – 60 billion cubic meters with aim to establish ability to transport additional gas supplies from (or through) Azerbaijan. With that deal Azerbaijan have considerably strengthened its positions both as the energy source for the European market as well as the transit state.

       No man is left behind. In September 2012 after intense diplomatic negotiations Iran have finally released two Azerbaijani poets wrongfully accused of espionage. Moreover, on August 31, 2012 convicted Azerbaijan’s armed forces officer Ramil Safarov was extradited to Azerbaijan where on the same day he was pardoned by the President of the Republic. Though Hungary, the extraditing state, have acted in accordance with European Convention on Extradition, Convention on the Transfer of Sentenced Persons and bilateral agreements, Republic of Armenia following the extradition, have decided to suspend the diplomatic relations with that country. This event, though serious diplomatic and political success of Azerbaijan, have also been used by third parties as an excuse for stalling already quite stagnant process of negotiations around Nagorno-Karabakh conflict. Frustrating ineffectiveness of Minsk Group as well as the slowing dynamics of the negotiations have thus prompted the question of future relevance of the OSCE format of mediation.

       Shutdown of Gabala radar station. Azerbaijan and Russia were unable to come to an agreement and extend a lease deal on Gabala radar station. Previous lease deal on one of 8 main elements of anti-missile defense system of former Soviet Union have expired on December 12, 2012. Two days prior to the end of agreement Russia have officially notified Azerbaijan that it will stop the exploitation of the radar. Official position on both sides sees no harm to the strategic partnership between the countries. The end of the lease on Gabala radar station is significant due to the fact that it was the last presence of Russian military forces in Azerbaijan. After 2012 there will be none.

 Kamal Makili-Aliyev

Doctor of Laws (LL.D)

30.12.2012

Continue reading →

Happy Holidays and Happy New Year

Continue reading →

Growing importance of cybersecurity for Azerbaijan

Only twenty years ago, the cybersecurity matters were of any concern only to people in Hollywood developing movies like “Hackers” that pictured the cybercrimes and cyberwarfare as science fiction. Today, we can safely say that we are living this science fiction.

Growing numbers of cyberattacks on the data and infrastructural systems underlines the importance of the comprehensive cybersecurity for states as well as individuals or corporations. World is experiencing the stage when wealth is digitized and that includes money, personal data and intellectual property. And if you locate your wealth in the digitized form, you have to be ready that cybercriminals may target it.

All that is just one part of the story. On the other hand, for the states like Azerbaijan, that are engaged in the protracted armed conflict for more than twenty years now, the nature of warfare is as changing as rapidly developing information and military technologies. Moreover, when there is an absence of active hostilities and only occasional skirmishes on the frontline, with years the warfare only naturally starts to shift its domains. Right now the shift became apparent. From classic domains of land and air, the warfare for Azerbaijan shifts towards so-called “5^th domain” or cyberspace.

The rapid development of information technologies both globally as well as regionally prompts the countries in the region to keep up with the cyberarms race. Cybersecurity is becoming more crucial for the comprehensive defense of not only digitalized wealth or data, but also quite physical infrastructure and communication systems. Free flow of information by itself constitutes a blessing as well as challenge to sustain and maintain it free.

In such situation Azerbaijan can soon face variety of cyberweapons directed against it. Such weapons were already used in several cases to disrupt, deny and deceive an adversary’s strategic intentions. Though such weapons have not proved to be yet coercive by themselves, they might become just that in the course of future development. Moreover, if used with more conventional instruments of power a coercive effect might build up. The danger of cyberweapons at the same time is in their contemporary indiscriminate character. Computer viruses such as Stuxnet or Flame that have been used as cyberweapons, for example, did not feature the proper level of targeting and became indiscriminate in the process of their use. Effective cyberattack is usually a complex operation with large burden of intelligence. Precisely because of that, for now, the resources and ability to carry out an effective cyberattack lie in the hands of states. However, due to the rapid development of technology, that might well change in the course of next years and provide the groups or even individuals with the same abilities to be engaged in cyberwarfare.

What is more is that for now there is no clear opinion in the international law itself on the matters of cyberwarfare. Many questions relate to if the laws of war apply to cyberwarfare? Can the state exercise its right to self-defense if attacked by the cyberattack? Can it retaliate with physical force?

In the situation of uncertainty even on the theoretical level, cybersecurity of Azerbaijan becomes of growing importance. In light of variety of threats that starts to be even more apparent. First and main threat in cyberwarfare is simple espionage. While it becomes more manageable, the danger to the security of your data, strategic plans or any other classified information increases dramatically as it becomes digitalized and networked. Cyberthreats directed toward obtaining such information should be then countered by the comprehensive security measures.

Another area is so-called “information war”. Being a victim of aggression and even having international law on your side does not by itself safeguard Azerbaijan from the flow of false information and propaganda. As our territories still occupied, so is our country still on the defensive in the “information war”, countering negative flow of the information as well as propaganda from Armenia. In such situation you want to maintain both free flow of information for yourself as well as to protect your “information hubs” from being compromised or misused by the enemy.

Third level of danger might bring even more severe consequences if reached. Cyberattacks proved to be able to bring physical and kinetic effects that become much more an alarming threat as the cyber-weapons progress. In the situation like that it is crucial for Azerbaijan to maintain an appropriate level of cybersecurity to protect its critical infrastructure such as energy grids, financial networks and defense industrial base. The rapid digitalization in these areas brought both positive results for overall infrastructure as well as new security concerns. 

For Azerbaijan the development of cybersecurity strategy becomes increasingly important. Comprehensive strategy in this area would provide for the implementation of effective centralized cybersecurity for the whole country to be able to answer any modern challenges of cyberwarfare, explore potential of cyberspace, protect its networks and systems, add to technological innovations in the area and strengthen collective cybersecurity with its international partners.

 Kamal Makili-Aliyev

Doctor of Laws (LL.D)

03.10.2012

News.az

Continue reading →

Ukrainian Gambit

Ukrainian parliamentary elections are getting closer and closer. On October 28, 2012 Ukraine will have to elect its new “Verkhovna Rada” that consists of 450 members, through new combined proportional and majoritarian (also called “First Past the Post”) systems. Under the new electoral legislation half of the seats in Rada will be elected through the former system (party lists), while the rest of them will be filled through the latter system of elections.

Moreover, the new legislation provides that the voting barrier to be reached by the party to be able to get any seats in parliament was raised to 5%, while political blocks are not able to participate in elections at all anymore – political parties only.

Considering all that, when we look at the pre-election situation it seems quite different from what was to see in 2007. No more there are political forces led by the Vladimir Litvin or Alexander Moroz with leftist and socialist ideas and at the same time there are changes in the opposition to the ruling Party of Regions too. Both most charismatic leaders of the opposition Yulia Tymoshenko and Yuriy Lutsenko are serving their sentences in jail due to criminal charges pressed against them almost a year ago. Hence, the opposition went with the policy of unification and gathered under the banners of All-Ukrainian Union "Fatherland". While the nominal leader of this Union is still Tymoshenko, it is becoming more obvious that the real leadership already belongs to Arseniy Yatsenyuk whose party Front of Changes became a part of the Fatherland in February this year.

Furthermore, there are new players in the game. Famous Ukrainian boxer Vitaliy Klychko is going to the elections as the leader of his newly developed party UDAR (Ukrainian Democratic Alliance for Reform). Almost no one expected such a pre-election success of that party and it has to be noted that its currents polls shows 12% of possible votes under the proportional system. Some experts forecast even 15% as the elections result for this party. Interesting situation is with another newcomer to the political battleground in Ukraine – the Party of Natalia Korolevska “Ukraine – Forward!” Though it is still unknown if this party will be able to reach 5% barrier (current polls less than 4%), it is still impressive how such a fast-runner could prove so well on the pre-election stage.

Last but not least is the participation in the elections of All-Ukrainian Union "Svoboda" led by Oleh Tyahnybok. The Union unites the nationalistic ideologies of Ukraine and currently believed to be able to pass the voting barrier and get its seats in parliament. Svoboda is in strong opposition to the Communist Party of Ukraine that has been steady in its decrease in popularity, however still able to get enough votes to secure seats in parliament.

From the general outlook to the situation one can see the progress in the political development in Ukraine in the sense that there are new political forces on the ground, new coalitions and balances on the table and there seems to be no stagnation in the ideological matters. However, when analyzing the situation on the practical level, everything seems quite different.

United opposition Fatherland on the current polls is a little bit stronger that the Party of Regions on proportional system and they have already negotiated the representation of the candidates in majoritarian system with Svoboda. However, there are still hindrances to the opposition in terms of the unequal opportunities in the pre-election campaigning.

When it comes to UDAR of Klychko and the party of Natalia Korolevska they tend to position themselves as an opposition to the current government, however there are some specifics that may indicate that the situation is less clear. For example, the main financial sources of “Ukraine – Forward!” come from the circles that are close to the Party of Regions, whereas the party of Klychko is still unable to reach some kind of agreement with the united opposition and their allies.

That leaves us with the Party of Regions that has a very interesting strategy. Apart from their customary coalition with the Communist Party, they seem to direct attention more to the first past the post candidates rather than to their party lists. The strategy then will be in form of “Ukrainian Gambit”, by sacrificing the victory on proportional system to the opposition, while gaining more seats in parliament through majoritarian system and securing the dominancy when attracting the possible “swinging parties” like “Ukraine – Forward!” or even UDAR of Klychko (if unable to reach an agreement with opposition) to their coalition in the parliament. 

Will the ruling Party of Regions be able to get its ultimate goal of 300 seats in parliament, thus securing an absolute constitutional majority, remains to be seen. Much will depend on if the new parties will be willing to make their own gambit and sacrifice the democracy for the representation in the parliament.

Kamal Makili-Aliyev

Doctor of Laws (LL.D)

03.10.2012

New Europe, Issue 1002, 14-20 October.
 

Continue reading →

Environment is Meant to Gain More Space in International Law

There are certain things that sometimes escape international lawyer’s mind. Important things that sometimes are lost in the shadows of conflicts and crisis situations, treaties and customary regulations of war and peace. I am talking about environmental concerns of the modern world and how international law is in attempt to regulate them.

To start discussing the regulations in themselves it is important to first remind ourselves about the reasoning behind the environmental challenges. I was reminded by one particular panel on Crans Montana Forum that was held in Baku in the very end of June, called “The Impact of Globalization on the World Environment”. When panel’s keynote-speaker Vice-President of Heydar Aliyev Foundation, IDEA Campaign founder Leyla Aliyeva was delivering her speech it was striking to me that though I knew that our country was left with major environmental concerns just after the Soviet past, I practically never stopped to think that it is I who will be one of those responsible for future cleanup, as every other citizen of my generation will be. When Ms. Aliyeva was talking about the role of younger generation in the prevention of negative effects to the environment – it became clear to me that everyone of us will be responsible to the answer the environmental challenges in his/her own capacity. If I am an international lawyer – then it is quite obvious where I should raise awareness.

However it is not enough just to spread the word and conduct your efforts accordingly. You need to relay them into the future. Just as Ms. Aliyeva pointed out – education on environment is essential to address the future environmental challenges. Our generation when growing up lacked that kind of education due to the period of change and struggle to the basic development, however now we owe it to our children to provide them with the knowledge they need to continue what we will start in preserving our nature, taking care of environment and striving for sustainable development. Because just like Ms. Aliyeva said – the young people are the forth front for environmental developments.

If there will be no action now we might one day find ourselves in the situation described by the other speaker on the panel Mr. Subramaniam Eassuwaren, New Leader 2012 from Sri Lanka who told his very said however educational story of how Sri Lanka lost almost 90% of its rainforests to the development without heed to the environmental protection. If we don’t want to face such situation sometime in the future, we need to answer the call of Ms. Aliyeva that there is a need for urgent actions and commitments on the part of younger generations.

So what does the international law do right now to protect environment? Mostly sought topics of regulation in international law concerning environment are climate change, sustainable development, biodiversity, transfrontier pollution, marine pollution, endangered species, hazardous materials and activities, cultural preservation, desertification and the uses of seas. All of these topics in one or another matter have found themselves in the scope of international environmental law. It is worth mentioning that United Nations has its own Environmental Programme.

However the main question still remains on how to enforce the international environmental law. Of course there are forums that provide the arbitration to environmental disputes between states. There are several international arbitration panels, including International Court of Justice itself. The major problem is that such arbitrations require states to voluntarily submit to their jurisdictions. In addition even if there is a decision made in the international arbitration, it heavily depends on national governments to enforce such decisions. Problems arise when the implementations of ruling is withheld or suspended due to the political or economic reasons.

Another hindrance in the implementation of international environmental law is the lack of the international body charged with the responsibility to enforce such law directly. Thus the responsibility lies on the national authorities to adopt and use implementing policies. That is why it is very important for the international bodies to at least conduct monitoring and diplomatic functions when it comes to the responsibility of the states to protect environment.

Nonetheless, it seems that there is an upcoming tendency of international community to get more involved in the matters concerning international environmental regulations. Though a lot still depends on the good will of the states it is everybody’s responsibility to raise awareness of the situation and demand the effective implementation of the norms that will help us save our future. And it is the responsibility of international lawyers everywhere to take action in the lobbying and promoting the efforts to enforce international environmental law. With that it can truly be said that environment is meant to gain its proper space in international law.

Kamal Makili-Aliyev

Doctor of Laws (LL.D)

17.07.2012

News.az

Continue reading →